Which DRR measure is explicitly linked to disaster risk reduction in forestland planning?

Which DRR measure is explicitly linked to disaster risk reduction in forestland planning?

• A. Re-plant forests as a DRR measure and cash-for-work program
• B. Contact the JEU for additional expertise in assessment and mitigation measures
• C. Install rainwater containers
• D. Educate local farmers on biodiversity

Answer: (A)

Restoring forest cover directly supports disaster risk reduction within forestland planning. Re-planting forests creates protective barriers on slopes, stabilizes soils, and enhances watershed function, which reduces the intensity and impact of hazards like landslides, floods, and erosion. This makes communities less exposed to disasters and improves resilience over the long term. When you add a cash-for-work element, you’re linking restoration with livelihoods, helping communities participate in risk-reducing activities while earning income, which supports faster recovery and sustained protection of the landscape. The other options don’t embed a risk-reduction action into forestland planning in the same way. Seeking external expertise is a procedural step, not a direct protective measure in the land-use plan. Installing rainwater containers relates to water management but not specifically to forestland risk reduction. Educating farmers on biodiversity is valuable for ecosystem health, but it isn’t an explicit DRR action tied to forestland planning.

Restoring forest cover directly supports disaster risk reduction within forestland planning. Re-planting forests creates protective barriers on slopes, stabilizes soils, and enhances watershed function, which reduces the intensity and impact of hazards like landslides, floods, and erosion. This makes communities less exposed to disasters and improves resilience over the long term. When you add a cash-for-work element, you’re linking restoration with livelihoods, helping communities participate in risk-reducing activities while earning income, which supports faster recovery and sustained protection of the landscape.

The other options don’t embed a risk-reduction action into forestland planning in the same way. Seeking external expertise is a procedural step, not a direct protective measure in the land-use plan. Installing rainwater containers relates to water management but not specifically to forestland risk reduction. Educating farmers on biodiversity is valuable for ecosystem health, but it isn’t an explicit DRR action tied to forestland planning.